A hit drama, an emptying studio city, and the value that only Real People Can Provide. Would you watch an AI Microdrama without real Actors?
Table of Contents
This summer, a Chinese historical drama ate an embarrassing amount of my weekends. A peasant girl who slaughters pigs for a living takes in an injured stranger, marries him to serve her own ends, and finds she’s tied herself to a fallen marquis in hiding. She rises, on her own terms, all the way to the rank of general.
That’s the premise of Pursuit of Jade, and it’s not really why it held me. What held me was the texture: a world that felt lived in, costumes with real weight, a soundtrack so strong that every character got their own melody instead of two songs recycled across sixty episodes. T
The show hit number one on iQIYI International in its first week after its March 2026 launch and pulled the leading search volume for Chinese dramas across fifteen markets.
What kept pulling at me was underneath all of that. The thing that made this show feel so human was made in the one place now watching its own ground shacking.
Why it worked
A lot of dramas run on makeover logic. Someone starts rough or hidden or underestimated, and the story rewards them by turning them into a smoother, more presentable version of themselves.
Pursuit of Jade climbs just as high and refuses that trade. Its heroine ends up a decorated general, and she gets there carrying the same butcher’s knife she started with. She never swaps her bluntness for court polish, never performs being anyone other than herself.
The knife that gutted pigs becomes the knife she takes to war, and at the very end she hangs it on the wall of a marquis’s hall, where everyone can see what actually did the work.
That’s a strange thing to notice in a costume romance, and it’s the thing I couldn’t stop thinking about. Her value moved with her. It was never attached to the stall, the village, or the role she was born into.
She took her worth with her instead of trading it in, and that’s the same question every business faces when the ground shifts underneath it. What comes loose when the setting changes, and what stays yours?
The production had that same quality. A June 2026 Hengdian World Studios release said more than 95% of the series was filmed at Hengdian, across scenic areas and historical sets built over decades.
That physical world is why the show felt tactile even when a few moments leaned too polished. One report noted that effects fans assumed were AI or CGI were actually handmade, including puppetry and green-screen work for the animals.
The value sat in something you couldn’t generate on demand, a built world and the people who knew how to use it.
That was enough to carry the show well past its own audience. Reviews, songs, memes and fan reenactments turned it into a cultural object, and regional commentary framed it as a soft-power win for Chinese drama abroad. Pursuit of Jade became one of the most internationally visible Chinese costume dramas of 2026.
The irony behind the success & AI microdramas
Pursuit of Jade was made largely in Hengdian, the studio city often called the heart of China’s costume-drama industry. Hengdian isn’t just a place with sets. It’s an ecosystem of soundstages, crews, extras, costume workers, makeup artists, lighting teams, and the small businesses that live off constant production.
That ecosystem is now being hollowed out from beneath by AI-generated microdramas. CNN reported that more than 120,000 microdramas came out in the first three months of 2026, and that 95% of them were AI-generated, decimating live-action production across the country.
Caixin described a ninety-day transformation in which tools like ByteDance’s Seedance 2.0 turned a labour-intensive industry into a high-speed content machine and pushed many Hengdian workers out of the market. CNA reported that more than 60% of live-action crews had quietly stopped work after Spring Festival, with AI arriving as the final blow on top of subsidy cuts and market saturation.
People felt it fast. CNN quoted actors whose jobs kept shrinking and whose pay fell with them, with some leading roles that once paid thousands of yuan now offered at around 300 yuan a day. A human-made drama that worked because of its built world and its living cast came out of a production hub that machine-made content is now emptying.
When value detaches from a person
There’s a sharper version of the same story, and it turns on the one asset that comes loose most easily. A star’s face crosses borders, builds fan communities, sells tourism back to the sets it was filmed on. It also turns up in places the star never agreed to.
There’s growing evidence that AI-generated performers in China aren’t always invented faces. Channel NewsAsia reported controversy around AI performers widely seen as resembling well-known actors, and cited a Beijing court ruling for an actress whose image rights were violated when companies used generative AI to build a recognisable character based on her.
Other reporting says some out-of-work actors now license their faces for AI use, sometimes for very small one-off payments, while ads seeking “facial materials” circulate on Douyin and Xiaohongshu. Performer representatives have condemned unauthorised face-swapping, voice cloning, and the scraping of material to train models.
The careful version of this claim is that there isn’t enough public evidence to say AI was trained on Hengdian actors as a group. What the evidence does show is a market learning to use the value of a person without the person. The face keeps earning. The career it belonged to gets left behind.
Who gets to take their craft with them?
Not everyone in that ecosystem is equally exposed, and the difference is the point. Some reports say former microdrama actors are moving into tourism and immersive performance. Global Times reported that out-of-work performers have turned to cultural tourist sites, playing roles in scenic locations as production slows. Hengdian itself has launched programmes where visitors can become actors and shoot their own short dramas.
On Instagram, wedding videos have started appearing that look like miniature costume dramas. There’s no strong reporting yet that displaced Hengdian crews are behind this at scale, but the logic isn’t hard to follow.
The people who know how to build emotion quickly, stage a symbolic scene, style a costume, and cut for a vertical screen are carrying exactly those skills into weddings, branded films and themed experiences.
That’s the quiet divide running through the story. A makeup artist whose craft was bound to a physical set has almost nowhere to take it once the set goes dark. A storyteller who can make a stranger cry in ninety seconds can do that at a wedding, in a shop’s launch video, or on a tour. The same collapse that strands one skill sets the other one loose.
What growth means when content creation is free
For most of the last decade, growth in content meant volume, more episodes and posts and versions produced faster than before. AI has made volume close to free, and the moment something becomes free, it stops being where the value is.
If a machine can generate a thousand competent costume dramas overnight, the competent ones are worth almost nothing. What survives is the value that can’t be lifted off a particular person or a particular world and recombined by a model.
Pursuit of Jade earns its place because its worth is fixed to something real, a built set, a cast with chemistry, a heroine written with enough specificity that you’d notice at once if she were swapped out.
When output is cheap, the advantage moves to whatever a machine can’t lift off you and reuse without you. For a business, that might be a relationship, a judgement call, a way of reading a market that took years to build. For a person, it’s the craft that goes with them rather than the role that was bolted to one place.
Fan Changyu understood this long before any of us did. She rose the whole way carrying the only thing that was ever truly hers, and when it was over, she hung it on the wall where everyone could see what had done the work.
.
— A question before you go
I keep thinking about that knife on the wall. Fan Changyu didn’t keep the marquis’s house, the army, or the title of general once the story wrapped. She kept a knife and years of knowing exactly how to use it, and that was enough for people to recognize her by.
What I keep asking myself, and now I’m asking you: strip away the job title, the company, the industry itself, and what’s left that nobody, and no model, could replace?
.
Sources
Caixin Global. (2025, November 15). Weekend long read: Two takes on China’s $14 billion micro-drama machine. https://www.caixinglobal.com/2025-11-15/weekend-long-read-two-takes-on-chinas-14-billion-micro-drama-machine-102383130.html
Caixin Global. (2026, June 1). Cover story: How AI took over China’s micro-drama industry in 90 days. https://www.caixinglobal.com/2026-06-01/cover-story-how-ai-took-over-chinas-micro-drama-industry-in-90-days-102449814.html
Channel NewsAsia. (2026). China’s AI microdramas go viral, but spark copyright fears. https://www.channelnewsasia.com/east-asia/china-generative-ai-microdramas-copyright-creative-concerns-6043656
Channel NewsAsia. (2026). AI is rewriting China’s filmmaking rulebook, but the script isn’t finished. https://www.channelnewsasia.com/east-asia/ai-microdrama-china-film-industry-actors-jobs-6229191
China Daily. (2026, March 20). Online drama ‘Pursuit of Jade’ draws global audience, tops charts. https://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202603/20/WS69bcff73a310d6866eb3ef73.html
China Daily. (2026, April 26). Chinese costume dramas top Southeast Asian streaming. https://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202604/26/WS69ed76cba310d6866eb45928.html
China Daily HK. (2026). Micro-dramas reshape China’s film economy. https://www.chinadailyhk.com/hk/article/635299
China Internet Watch. (2026). China’s actors never rejected AI. They demanded terms. https://www.ciw.news/p/china-actors-ai-licensing
CNA Lifestyle. (2026). Pursuit of Jade actress Tian Xiwei ‘proud’ of drama’s success. https://cnalifestyle.channelnewsasia.com/entertainment/tian-xiwei-zhang-linghe-pursuit-jade-success-581731
CNN. (2026, August 22). Quiet on set: How AI transformed China’s microdrama scene. https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/22/style/short-drama-ai-china-intl-hnk
CRI. (2026, April 7). AI redefines China’s booming micro drama industry. https://city.cri.cn/20260407/2ce63e4f-36f2-4938-6e15-70325caf9b05-i.html
Global Times. (2026, August). Out-of-work Chinese actors turn to theme parks as immersive performers. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202608/1368144.shtml
Hengdian World Studios. (2026, June 19). From screen to scene: Hengdian World Studios tourism spikes at Pursuit of Jade sets [Press release]. GlobeNewswire. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/06/19/3314715/0/en/from-screen-to-scene-hengdian-world-studios-tourism-spikes-at-pursuit-of-jade-sets.html
Options The Edge. (2026). What Southeast Asia can learn about soft power and influence from hit C-drama ‘Pursuit of Jade’. https://www.optionstheedge.com/topic/culture/what-southeast-asia-can-learn-about-soft-power-and-influence-hit-c-drama-%E2%80%98pursuit-jade
The World of Chinese. (2024, March). High stakes in short takes: China’s booming micro-drama business. https://www.theworldofchinese.com/2024/03/high-stakes-in-short-takes-chinas-booming-micro-drama-business/
Tonboriday. (2026, March). Pursuit of Jade production reveals clever practical effects. https://www.tonboriday.com/2026/03/pursuit-of-jade-production-reveals.html
36Kr. (2026). AI short dramas disrupting Hengdian: Actors flood in. https://eu.36kr.com/en/p/3935080699297152
8days. (2026). Jobless due to AI micro dramas, Chinese actors now license their faces. https://www.8days.sg/entertainment/asian/chinese-actors-facial-likeness-ai-dramas-860711
Leave a Reply